Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search
News
The Rules
- It's time you read them if you haven't already.
Main
ManaNation.com
ManaNation Forums - Magic the Gathering strategy discussions
»
Magic Formats
»
Extended
»
Stompy God
Pages: [
1
]
Print
Author
Topic: Stompy God (Read 124 times)
Jacrash
Newbie
Posts: 5
Stompy God
«
on:
September 24, 2008, 01:04:45 PM »
Here's the decklist:
4
Demigod of Revenge
4
Deus of Calamity
4
Magus of the Moon
4
Simian Spirit Guide
4
Skirk Prospector
4
Desperate Ritual
4
Seething Song
4
Empty the Warrens
4
Rite of Flame
4
Chrome Mox
4
Gemstone Caverns
16
Mountain
For the sideboard I only know that I want to have 4
Street Wraith
to trade for the
Gemstone Caverns
if I have to play first in second or third game. I'll always choose to play second on the first game.
I really like to have
Deus of Calamity
on turn one. But it can do really well on most ocasions going with a big guy or a lot of goblins in the first couple of turns.
I think
Empty the Warrens
is the worst card in the deck. maybe SoA will have a nice replacement.
Tell me what you think.
Logged
imachampion
Hero Member
MTGO: imachampion
Posts: 1,270
Average guy by day...Superhero at night.
Re: Stompy God
«
Reply #1 on:
September 24, 2008, 01:41:15 PM »
Quote from: Jacrash on September 24, 2008, 01:04:45 PM
For the sideboard I only know that I want to have 4
Street Wraith
to trade for the
Gemstone Caverns
if I have to play first in second or third game. I'll always choose to play second on the first game.
Why? You said yourself that you like a turn 1
Deus of Calamity
. Going second makes him almost strictly worse. Would you care to explain this? Is this strictly because of
Gemstone Caverns
? I think that
Gemstone Caverns
is a bad card. No offense to you...I mean the Japanese seem to consistantly play the card...but you have 20 mana
accelerants
in the deck. I don't think that the additional card-disadvantage is worth adding 4 more. But thats just me.
I also don't see the point of
Skirk Prospector
in the deck. By himself its a "Free Spell." I do see how you would ideally get tons of mana off an
Empty the Warrens
...but at that point you are only (R) away from being able to cast everything in your deck anyway.
I have to admit though...I like the idea of the deck. Here is what I would change though:
-4
Gemstone Caverns
-4
Skirk Prospector
+4
Figure of Destiny
+4
Wooded Foothills
The deck thinning is always a good thing. While
Figure of Destiny
is an amazing 1 drop in Mono Red.
Maybe I missed something here...and if I did I apologize. I do think that the above changes would drastically improve the deck. Please make sure to keep this thread active and post additional info on both the progression of the deck and its matchups.
«
Last Edit: September 24, 2008, 01:49:29 PM by imachampion
»
Logged
The next time you think you are perfect...try walking on water.
You miss 100% of the shots you never take. -Wayne Gretzky
If you got everything that you wished for...there would be nothing left to wish for.
Hexatomb
Jr. Member
Posts: 79
Re: Stompy God
«
Reply #2 on:
September 24, 2008, 01:56:49 PM »
The deck seems like a lot of fun, especially
Magus of the Moon
with all the Nonbasic land love going on these days.
Instead of
Empty the Warrens
, why not try
Rise of the Hobgoblins
?
And I actually like
Soulbright Flamekin
in red creature decks. As long as you have a few creatures out, you can get some free mana. :-) You do have a lot of fun mana gain spells already, but I don't think
Desperate Ritual
is all that great.
I would also suggest something to handle the swarm decks,
Firespout
,
Cone of Flame
or
Flameshot
maybe...
After mentioning to Champ that none of my circle plays red, I've been putting together a red deck. I really like
Incendiary Command
in a deck that can handle the mana cost.
Logged
imachampion
Hero Member
MTGO: imachampion
Posts: 1,270
Average guy by day...Superhero at night.
Re: Stompy God
«
Reply #3 on:
September 24, 2008, 02:50:46 PM »
@Hex,
Burn doesn't need to be in this deck.
Rise of the Hobgoblins
isn't better than
Empty the Warrens
in this deck either. This deck is using spells to ramp into tokens. Because of this the storm mechanic is going to be much better than a simple "X" spell.
Feel free to post the direction of your burn deck in a different thread so we can discuss it.
Logged
The next time you think you are perfect...try walking on water.
You miss 100% of the shots you never take. -Wayne Gretzky
If you got everything that you wished for...there would be nothing left to wish for.
Jacrash
Newbie
Posts: 5
Re: Stompy God
«
Reply #4 on:
September 24, 2008, 07:13:30 PM »
My idea was that, with decks as fast as Affinity, Burn, Belcher, Goblins, White Weenie, Storm, Boros or Tarmofolk, and with decks as "controllers" as Faeries, various Level Blue or Swans, I wanted a deck that could create a winning board status in a couple of turns. For that I guessed I would need to be hyper focused having 8/12 winners (I doubt
Empty the Warrens
can be a winner as the others are), 12 mana multipliers, 12 mana accelerants (with gemstone and mox I can have 3 "lands" in play on turn one). This idea leaves 8 slots that decided to go to metagame (magus) and mana again (skirk prospector).
This choice has its bad sides. It needs a very precise opening hand which means mulligan agressive. It busts our hand in no time. It has no long term game.
So with what you guys said I agree with
Figure of Destiny
for
Empty the Warrens
. It's a nicer winning condition and a better long game. I propose
Shard Volley
or
Mogg Fanatic
for
Skirk Prospector
that gives me the removal that I don't have. I still think
Gemstone Caverns
is an important card. Playing second with this card gives me a good chance to put a "monster" on turn one.
Street Wraith
for it when playing first gives me a conscript that increases the focus of the deck.
Do you agree?
Logged
Jacrash
Newbie
Posts: 5
Re: Stompy God
«
Reply #5 on:
September 25, 2008, 09:09:04 AM »
Another ideas:
a turn one
Chandra Nalaar
is quite devastating...
if I go for
Figure of Destiny
I might as well put a couple of
Umezawa's Jitte
another card for the slots jeft could be
Arc-Slogger
in this hand buster deck, what about one
Keldon Megaliths
?
Logged
imachampion
Hero Member
MTGO: imachampion
Posts: 1,270
Average guy by day...Superhero at night.
Re: Stompy God
«
Reply #6 on:
September 25, 2008, 09:25:36 AM »
I am a little confused by your post. How exactly is
Skirk Prospector
removal?
Empty the Warren
on turn 1 can be devastating for another deck. Imagine this play:
Mountain
Rite of Flame
Rite of Flame
Seething Song
Empty the Warrens
On turn 1 you get 8 1/1s. How can this not swing a game?
Figure of Destiny
is a card that you can either drop and progress slowly...or power out an 8/8 from him. He is a very good card...and fits very nicely into your deck.
Gemstone Caverns
ruins your biggest chance to outright end a game on turn 1. If you play second and you pull
Deus of Calamity
on your turn 1...your opponent will always have a land in play and will get the opportunity to play a 2 drop before you start dominating their lands. Now I am not balking at a
Deus of Calamity
in that situation...I am just saying that if you played first...you could swing on your opponent when he only has 1 land in play. This will effectively make sure your opponent won't be able to do anything. Granted there will be decks that will provide blockers but...this starts them on their back foot.
The same above senerio is true for
Demigod of Revenge
. If you wait to play second...you are giving your opponent and entire turn of development to find an answer. If you drop
Demigod of Revenge
on turn 1 while playing first...your opponent is going to get 3 turns to answer they or he die. If you play second...you are giving them 4 turns. I'm sorry but playing first is just more beneficial for this deck.
Umezawa's Jitte
is an amazing card...but in this type of deck...where you are trying to power out practically unanswerable threats...I think that it is to slow.
Chandra Nalaar
looks like it could be rather good. I would probably put it in the sideboard though. If the first ability could hit creatures it could be maindecks...but in a meta where you will see creatures every turn being laid by your opponent...I don't see it living long enough to be relevant. Against a slower control deck you could sideboard it in...I guess.
Keldon Megalith
comes into play tapped making your turn 1 much less attractive. This deck has the potential to seal the game up on turn 1. Anything that prevents that...seems rather bad.
Logged
The next time you think you are perfect...try walking on water.
You miss 100% of the shots you never take. -Wayne Gretzky
If you got everything that you wished for...there would be nothing left to wish for.
Hexatomb
Jr. Member
Posts: 79
Re: Stompy God
«
Reply #7 on:
September 25, 2008, 04:04:45 PM »
Oh my bad, I wasn't really paying attention to the storm mechanic. OK, well, now I have no advice for this deck.. good luck guys :-)
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General Discussions
-----------------------------
=> Forum Business
=> General Discussion
-----------------------------
Magic Formats
-----------------------------
=> Standard
=> Block Constructed
=> Extended
=> Eternal Formats
===> Vintage
===> Legacy
=> Sealed Deck
=> Drafting
=> Two-Headed Giant
-----------------------------
For the Game
-----------------------------
=> The Rules
=> Magic Set Discussion
===> Shards of Alara
===> Conflux
=> Magic Online
=> Competitive Magic Discussion
=> Casual Magic Discussions
=> Magic Events
=> Traders
-----------------------------
Show Focused
-----------------------------
=> Show Discussions
=> Article Discussions
=> Show Ideas and Input
Loading...