• Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
    Did you miss your activation email?


    Login with username, password and session length
  • News

    The Rules - It's time you read them if you haven't already.

Cool Stuff Inc - Use code ManaNation10 for 10% off singles
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: blocking with a tap  (Read 150 times)
iokepa
Newbie
*
Posts: 19



View Profile
« on: September 29, 2008, 01:09:48 PM »

I noticed in a recent podcast, Lee used a Mutavault as a creature to block - but also tapped it for mana. (at least I think thats what he did, i could be remembering it wrong). Anyways, can someone explain to me how that's legal?

If you block, and then tap in response to something: doesn't the tap go on top of the stack, and then you wouldn't be able to block with it?

« Last Edit: September 29, 2008, 01:17:17 PM by iokepa » Logged
UnityErik
Newbie
*
*
Posts: 21


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2008, 01:55:52 PM »

Nope.

The first thing that happens in the Declare Blockers step is, well, you ... heh, declare blockers. This action doesn't use the stack and can't be responded to. After blockers are locked in, there is a point of priority for both players before the game moves on to the next step.

So, yes, you can block with a creature and then use it's tap ability and it will still be blocking an attacker.
Logged

UnityErik@earthlink.net
Event Manager
www.UnityEntertainment.net
352-404-9500
DCI Level 3 Judge
iokepa
Newbie
*
Posts: 19



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2008, 02:30:30 PM »

okay, thanks. one question that arises to me now - you said that declaring blockers can't be responded too. So,

I declare a 2/2 attacker.
Opponent declares no blockers.
I play an instant that pumps my attacker - making it a 5/5.
I do 5 damage to my opponent.

I thought you could play instants anytime during your turn, but only in response during an opponent's turn. If that's true - is the above example legal?
Logged
Lythand
Avatared
****
MTGO: Lythand
Posts: 450



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2008, 04:23:56 PM »

okay, thanks. one question that arises to me now - you said that declaring blockers can't be responded too. So,

I declare a 2/2 attacker.
Opponent declares no blockers.
I play an instant that pumps my attacker - making it a 5/5.
I do 5 damage to my opponent.

I thought you could play instants anytime during your turn, but only in response during an opponent's turn. If that's true - is the above example legal?


You are essentially casting the instant after the blockers have been locked in and priority has been granted to you during your opponant's turn.

You may cast instances anytime you are granted priority on your opponant's turn, assuming there is no other restrictions in play that prevent you from doing so like Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir
Logged
Trick
Administrator
*
MTGO: Catacomb
Posts: 1,112



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2008, 08:44:08 AM »

iokepa, unfortunately there isn't a good way to show this in a normal game of Magic but during every step where someone is able to play something, both players have the opportunity to play spells. Never does only one player have an opportunity to play things.

So if it's your turn and you decide not to play anything during the main phase, your opponent can still play instants or Flash in creatures or use abilities that are at instant speed.

If it's your opponent's end of turn and they don't have any actions, you still have an opportunity.

Does that clarify it for you?
Logged

Legends Never Die
"If there is a good play and a better play, then the good play is actually a bad play." -- Jon Finkel
iokepa
Newbie
*
Posts: 19



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2008, 07:03:24 AM »

Yeah, thanks Trick.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: